Welcome
Welcome to Caer Abred: Forum of the Druidic Order of Naturalists

Druidic Naturalism holds that there is only Nature and that the scientific method is the best suited to determine the nature of Nature. This is balanced with an aesthetic response to the world that is in line with that shared by the Druid community as a whole.

Druidic Naturalists will probably tend to be Pantheist, Agnostic or Atheist, yet see in Druidry an appropriate philosophy that allows one to honour ones Land and Ancestors in a way that establishes a healthy, and ethical, relationship with them and with ones fellow creatures.

Druidic Naturalism, as it has developed so far, embraces ritual, art and celebration as effective and satisfying ways to express this secular spirituality.

Our Wiki can be found at http://caerabred.wikispaces.com/

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

In this forum section, the basis of religious or spiritual beliefs are not subject to skeptical scrutiny. This means that an amended version of forum rule 3 applies here. Please familiarise yourself with it before posting in this section.

Moderator: Morgan the snake

Forum rules
This forum section's version of Rule 3: All scientific and political opinions and beliefs, but NOT religious or spiritual beliefs, are fair game for criticism on this forum.

Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

Postby White Horse » Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:12 am

Ye, and it came to pass, that i have undergone an unverifiable gnostic experience and reverted unto the Woo Woo again. In short, I suddenly find I can believe in a Deity again somewhere deep deep down...... And no, I can't prove there is such...and I suddenly don't need to try anymore. My new found spirituality is still a liberal, nature loving rather fluffy Deism. It might be pointed out by those with long memories that I did have a deistic phase last year but that was more an intellectual wobble. Now its one of those Road-to-Damascus-Seeing-the-Light type of brain storms (or a turning-out-the-light loony tunes interval, depending on your point of view). You see,the heart has reasons when the brain just gives up.

Of course in Mob terms this means I've become a little snivelling turncoat and supergrass.....but I'm on the witness protection program which is why I've come out in the Fluffy Inner Grove at the moment.
"It's not the despair... I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand."
~ John Cleese as Brian Stimpson, Clockwise [1986]

http://radical-apathy.blogspot.com/
User avatar
White Horse
HOST
HOST
 
Posts: 1506
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:32 am
Location: Siluria
Druid Grade: Bard

 

Re: Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

Postby cursuswalker » Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:43 am

In which case I shall offer you a manly hug :D :hug:
Image Nihil timendum est
User avatar
cursuswalker
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 4004
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Sussex
Religious Beliefs: Naturalist Humanist Druid
Politics: Left of Centre-Green
Druid Grade: Ovate-Skeptic
Mob affiliation: Infra-Red

Re: Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

Postby treegod » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:50 am

And that's why I'm a Holistic Spectrum Mercenary, what if I want to change? What if I'm going through a phase? What if my opinions don't fit comfortably in one mob or another? ;)

I wish you well on your Woo Woo journey. :D
User avatar
treegod
HOST
HOST
 
Posts: 1066
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:11 am
Location: Here
Druid Grade: Druid
Mob affiliation: Holistic Spectrum Mercenary

Re: Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

Postby Chairman Bill » Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:04 pm

I've little problem with deism as a concept, but can't really see what difference it makes to things.
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring

Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense
Carl Sagan
User avatar
Chairman Bill
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:48 am
Location: Somerset
Religious Beliefs: Naturalist atheist/pantheist
Politics: Democratic socialist

Re: Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

Postby chris » Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:19 pm

:hug:
User avatar
chris
HOST
HOST
 
Posts: 1441
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 6:13 pm
Location: Abergorlech in The Land Of Enchantment
Religious Beliefs: Sky Dancing Tantra, Shamanism
Politics: Rainbow Green
Druid Grade: Awenydd

Re: Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

Postby Red Raven » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:23 pm

I learn't a while ago that rationality is good for most of life's experiences but to place my entire spectrum of experiences at this particular altar is to deny some experiences by trying to force them into a frame of reference that doesn't fit and may actually do more harm than good (least ways for me!). I fear that sometimes we tend to spend too much time trying to justify the means by which we arrive at these experiences with each other, a hangover from the Abrahamic religion's competition for domination, and may miss the point of these experiences, namely paying attention to what is actually being demonstrated to us. If we consider that we are being shown these things for a reason, and have enough confidence in our own reasoning processes to acknowledge that we don't actually, at this time, have all the answers, then it would be sensible, IMO, to pay respect to the origin of these same experiences. How this respect is shown is up to the individual to consider.

RR
Red Raven
Resident
Resident
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Glasgow
Religious Beliefs: Fluffy Bunny/ woo woo
Mob affiliation: Untouchable

Re: Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

Postby simonchadwick » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:12 am

Yes to echo CB and also to fly the flag for apatheism, I'd be interested WH if you could offer some indights as to why (or indeed whether) it actually matter at all?
:popcorn:
User avatar
simonchadwick
Resident
Resident
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:36 pm
Location: Scotland
Religious Beliefs: I don't think so!
Politics: Disgusting

Re: Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

Postby White Horse » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:57 pm

treegod wrote:And that's why I'm a Holistic Spectrum Mercenary, what if I want to change? What if I'm going through a phase? What if my opinions don't fit comfortably in one mob or another? ;)

I wish you well on your Woo Woo journey. :D


You know, given my history of continually wobbling between belief, agnosticism and non-belief, perhaps I should become a Holistic Spectrum Mercenary too...that is, if you don't mind Treegod?
"It's not the despair... I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand."
~ John Cleese as Brian Stimpson, Clockwise [1986]

http://radical-apathy.blogspot.com/
User avatar
White Horse
HOST
HOST
 
Posts: 1506
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:32 am
Location: Siluria
Druid Grade: Bard

Re: Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

Postby White Horse » Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:30 pm

simonchadwick wrote:Yes to echo CB and also to fly the flag for apatheism, I'd be interested WH if you could offer some indights as to why (or indeed whether) it actually matter at all?


Hmm. I take it that you are asking why would the existence of a deistic god/goddess/Great Spirit (take your pick) of deism matter? Well I won't be saying it should matter to you..but to me it matters for a number of reasons. My account of deism is not quite conventional. I'm rather more accurately a pandeist or pan-en-deist but those terms are even less well known. Look them up on Wikipaedia if you like. For me some aspect of the divine is within creation or creation within the divine. This is my contact point with paganism. My bridge with naturalism is that deism seeks to uphold reason and science. I even believe the results of reason and science are to be preferred as far more reliable than subjective experience (except perhaps to the person who has the UPG), yet - and heres the root point of difference - subjective experience including mystical experiences are potentially imho, also a genuine source of knowledge. Naturally the knowledge gained by these different routes should not be in conflict, and deism is an attempt to reconcile the more apparently supernatural experiences of god/gods with science. The alternative views which suggest they must be antagonist and one preferred over the other are fundamentalism on the oneside and naturalistic atheism on the other.

Babble...babble. anyway, if like me you are blessed (or perhaps cursed) with a mystical frame of mind, then the deistic god is handy explanation and perhaps object-symbol or focus for those mystical inclinations - and by mystical I mean the intuitive sense of some profound unity, pattern or purpose to existence, the sense of the supreme 'Other' or Higher Power(s) or another reality.
I am not committed to insisting that there is only one deity or that it is a bloke or that it is like an individual person in the human sense (I very much doubt it). Transpersonal cosmic consciousness anyone? Maybe the universe evolves into the divine, to become the ultimate self caused cause. I am open to suggestions, but frankly my UPG tells me any divinity is a mystery beyond duality and any human categories, not even a 'being' at all.

Traditionally, we can say that deism has been offered as an explantion of the First Cause that set the initial conditions of the universe.

Its a possible explanation along with the Multi-Verse hypothesis for the extreme fine turning of the Cosmos to enable the existence of stable matter, life and intelligent life anywhere at all, an apparently extremely improbable event

The deistic deity can be understood as the source of the three fundamental mysteries: Being (why is there something rather than nothing) Life (how does it arise from the merely inanimate) and Consciousness (which defies reductionist explanation).

It would be the source of our ideals of Love, Beauty, Justice (why do we have such ideals and values? what is their survival value?)

It might offer an After-Life (though Deists need not believe in one) or at least a collective goal for the Universe (such as the hope of a final evolution of life to higher plane of consciousness or non-finite nature or full incarnation of the divine ideal).

It would mean that the beauty and magnificence of nature, life and consciousness will last forever in some form because they are underpinned or embedded in a higher dimensional reality that is beyond space-time. You see in purely naturalistic terms nature and life on earth is not eternal It will cease to exist sometime in the far distant future, though earth life could disappear much sooner, then what does one do with a nature spiritulity?. A deity offers a kind of guarantee. That is kind of comforting, though not in a personal sugary, comfort blanket sort of way.
Deism is unlikely to start any wars. It does not depend on holy books or ethnically particular prophets. The Deity does not intervene or answer prayers. It need not clash with science. Nature is its revelation and manifestation. My deism believes in reason, but my particular variety of belief also involves subjective illumination and the assumption that every being has a sense of the inner light/divine spark at the core of our natures.

its also the underpinning theology of Iolo's Barddas. Its not very neo-pagan, though its plenty meso-druid and perennial philosophy.

I can guess at least some of the objections. Atheists will point out my view assumes the mystical inclinations are not just neuro-chemical imbalances. It hints that the universe may exist for a reason, implying that more than random chance is at work because of the initial conditions or particular parameters set into the universe. And fundamentally, without the subjective gnostic element, it is 'not proven' objectively speaking. But if it is true, then we each can, in theory, gnostically discover it for ourselves.
Last edited by White Horse on Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:04 am, edited 3 times in total.
"It's not the despair... I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand."
~ John Cleese as Brian Stimpson, Clockwise [1986]

http://radical-apathy.blogspot.com/
User avatar
White Horse
HOST
HOST
 
Posts: 1506
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:32 am
Location: Siluria
Druid Grade: Bard

Re: Got the Woo-Woo bad at the moment...

Postby treegod » Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:16 pm

White Horse wrote:
treegod wrote:And that's why I'm a Holistic Spectrum Mercenary, what if I want to change? What if I'm going through a phase? What if my opinions don't fit comfortably in one mob or another? ;)

I wish you well on your Woo Woo journey. :D


You know, given my history of continually wobbling between belief, agnosticism and non-belief, perhaps I should become a Holistic Spectrum Mercenary too...that is, if you don't mind Treegod?


Why ask me? I'm a mercenary, if the money's right... ;)
User avatar
treegod
HOST
HOST
 
Posts: 1066
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:11 am
Location: Here
Druid Grade: Druid
Mob affiliation: Holistic Spectrum Mercenary

Next

Return to The Fluffy Inner Grove of the Woo-Woo



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron
suspicion-preferred